<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-1541</link>
		<author>Dax</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>I don't have time to follow these discussion, nor do I have the time to give a scientific lecture here (too busy with my own research), but I do want to point out an enormous flaw in Rob's "irreducible complex vision" argument. The way Rob poses the problem makes it seem that all proteins involved in the cascade had to have evolved dependently of each-other, which is not the case! The proteins and mechanisms involved are common in pretty much everything that happens in our body. For instance, the trans and cis motifs of proteins are common among almost every conformation changing protein, and is a major factor in the induction of DNA damage due to UV radiation (how is that intelligently designed!). In this case, ulcanic acid shifts from trans to cis. ATP, or the cousin GTP, is how proteins transfer energy, and again is common. The same for all the other cascades: all common motifs and mechanisms.
Molecular biological arguments of irreducible complexity always assume that the each subunit of the entire protein, or each protein in a cascade, needed to evolve dependently of all the other factors, which is just false! Life uses and re-uses! We see this in the homology (similarity) of proteins between species: the further the species are apart on an evolutionary scale, the more diverging the proteins are... and even then we can still determine which parts are really important, because these have been conserved, eg. don't differ that much. Even between humans and yeast!
Science is so amazing! It is a waste not to probe deeper because we just argue that it has been designed. We would miss out on how intricately connected all life on this planet truly is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to follow these discussion, nor do I have the time to give a scientific lecture here (too busy with my own research), but I do want to point out an enormous flaw in Rob&#8217;s &#8220;irreducible complex vision&#8221; argument. The way Rob poses the problem makes it seem that all proteins involved in the cascade had to have evolved dependently of each-other, which is not the case! The proteins and mechanisms involved are common in pretty much everything that happens in our body. For instance, the trans and cis motifs of proteins are common among almost every conformation changing protein, and is a major factor in the induction of DNA damage due to UV radiation (how is that intelligently designed!). In this case, ulcanic acid shifts from trans to cis. ATP, or the cousin GTP, is how proteins transfer energy, and again is common. The same for all the other cascades: all common motifs and mechanisms.<br />
Molecular biological arguments of irreducible complexity always assume that the each subunit of the entire protein, or each protein in a cascade, needed to evolve dependently of all the other factors, which is just false! Life uses and re-uses! We see this in the homology (similarity) of proteins between species: the further the species are apart on an evolutionary scale, the more diverging the proteins are&#8230; and even then we can still determine which parts are really important, because these have been conserved, eg. don&#8217;t differ that much. Even between humans and yeast!<br />
Science is so amazing! It is a waste not to probe deeper because we just argue that it has been designed. We would miss out on how intricately connected all life on this planet truly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-918</link>
		<author>Webster</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Speaking of unicorns:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gg9q1oD4W9a8TZHYfvE4ToLE90iAD9181I381</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of unicorns:</p>
<p><a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gg9q1oD4W9a8TZHYfvE4ToLE90iAD9181I381" rel="nofollow">http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gg9q1oD4W9a8TZHYfvE4ToLE90iAD9181I381</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-907</link>
		<author>Brian</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>For those confused about the use of the word unicorn in the King James Version of the Bible (for example: the creators of this website), you should grab a good book about the history of Bible translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those confused about the use of the word unicorn in the King James Version of the Bible (for example: the creators of this website), you should grab a good book about the history of Bible translation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dree</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-895</link>
		<author>dree</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-895</guid>
		<description>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/06/080612-unicorn-video-ap.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/06/080612-unicorn-video-ap.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/06/080612-unicorn-video-ap.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jemma Web</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-870</link>
		<author>Jemma Web</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 03:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>hi i was just wondering how long did unicorndlive for and do they still live?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i was just wondering how long did unicorndlive for and do they still live?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willow</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-869</link>
		<author>willow</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>At school kids in my class had a debate on unicorns being real or not .
I want to know if unicorns are real or not . I liked your website and was that a real unicorn skeleton or not ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At school kids in my class had a debate on unicorns being real or not .<br />
I want to know if unicorns are real or not . I liked your website and was that a real unicorn skeleton or not ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-849</link>
		<author>Michelle</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Unicorns did exist.  We humans forced them into extinction by the wanton practice of killing them for their horns.  The Black Rhinoceros is going to become extinct before too much longer for the same reason.

Another point.  There are many, many ancient tapestries depicting a royal family with a Unicorn in their midst like the family dog.

Putting a non-existant creature into the middle of one of the tapestries makes about as much sense as taking a formal family photo and sticking Mickey Mouse into the middle of it!

Fossil evidence is so difficult to find, because the horn had such value.  They wouldn't be left to rot if the animal died naturally.  Unicorns were hunted, and the hunters were not against taking the horns from animals regardless of whether they died of natural causes or were slaughtered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unicorns did exist.  We humans forced them into extinction by the wanton practice of killing them for their horns.  The Black Rhinoceros is going to become extinct before too much longer for the same reason.</p>
<p>Another point.  There are many, many ancient tapestries depicting a royal family with a Unicorn in their midst like the family dog.</p>
<p>Putting a non-existant creature into the middle of one of the tapestries makes about as much sense as taking a formal family photo and sticking Mickey Mouse into the middle of it!</p>
<p>Fossil evidence is so difficult to find, because the horn had such value.  They wouldn&#8217;t be left to rot if the animal died naturally.  Unicorns were hunted, and the hunters were not against taking the horns from animals regardless of whether they died of natural causes or were slaughtered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hang in There</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-846</link>
		<author>Hang in There</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Wait.......so, the Bible ISN'T supposed to be taken literally??

I'm really confused here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230;&#8230;.so, the Bible ISN&#8217;T supposed to be taken literally??</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really confused here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbey and Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-844</link>
		<author>Abbey and Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Unicorns are sexy, and their flippin sweet, and i dream about them at night.
Also we think about them when we are riding horsees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unicorns are sexy, and their flippin sweet, and i dream about them at night.<br />
Also we think about them when we are riding horsees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-842</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unicornmuseum.org/wp/comments/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>To the Christians:
http://a683.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/64/l_99e9b56709a01c818e4693fa4e39a092.jpg
I lol'd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Christians:<br />
<a href="http://a683.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/64/l_99e9b56709a01c818e4693fa4e39a092.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://a683.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/64/l_99e9b56709a01c818e4693fa4e39a092.jpg</a><br />
I lol&#8217;d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
